Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
54,863 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,312 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,066 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,485 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-04-26 17:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Mark Hansen
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-28 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Bacchante head applique 1st century AD in the Museo archeologico nazionale

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-28 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Tibetan collections of the Musée Georges Labit - Conque 'Dung-dkar'
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-28 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Pierre Briguiboul par Marcel Briguiboul Musée Goya‎ Castres France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-04-28 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Codakia punctata (Punctate Lucina), left valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-04-28 07:37 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Rude Selo
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-04-28 11:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Jakobshavn Isbræ, aerial view from west side
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-04-28 11:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Jakobshavn Isbræ, aerial view looking to west side
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-04-28 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
La Vellerie - C.R.I.E. de Mouscron view from Rue de la Vellerie. (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-04-28 15:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Decoration on the vaults of the Reformierte Kirche Zernez (interior) (Detail)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-04-28 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Ferrari SF90 Spider - left rear view
Used in:
de:Ferrari SF90 Stradale, en:Ferrari SF90 Stradale
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-04-28 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Daewoo Kalos - left rear view
Used in:
de:Chevrolet Kalos
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-04-29 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithium atromarginatum (Black Lipped Cerith), shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-04-29 08:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of the victims of Holodomor in Rubchenky

 Support Useful & Used. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-04-29 21:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Platysteira cyanea (Brown-throated wattle-eye), male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Fragment of a funerary stele inv.294 - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Symphoricarpos albus - Fruits and foliage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Tour de l'ancienne abbaye bénédictine - clocher de la Cathédrale Saint-Benoît
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 14:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Only available complete image of Royal Enfield Cruiser
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 14:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Karakavalasa railway bridge on Kothavalasa–Kirandul line
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Machilipatnam Lighthouse
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Sri Amaralingeswara Swamy Rath Yatra
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of the Chastè e baselgia, Ardez East side.
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-04-30 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument dedicated to King Albert 1st, in the municipal park of Mouscron (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-04-30 19:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Rubchenky
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Insegna dell'arte dei Mureri (bricklayers) - Correr Museum

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Jardin de l'Évêché de Castres vu du Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Self-portrait with hat by Marcel Briguiboul Goya Museum‎ Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-01 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Iphigenia brasiliensis (Giant False Donax), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Migration by Francis Buyse - Mouscron, view from Av. des Seigneurs de Mouscron
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Pan troglodytes (Chimpanzee), alpha male, walking
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:58 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Rachky
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-05-01 16:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Panorama of Visakhapatnam Port
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC) on 2024-05-01 18:10 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Seal of Theosophical Society, SVG version
Used in:
en:Theosophical Society, es:Esoterismo, es:Teosofía, fi:Esoteerisuus, it:Società Teosofica
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Espandero (talk) on 2024-05-01 20:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Sex de Marinda in winter.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-02 04:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Main entrance of the South side.
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Figures and stories of Saints - Lorenzo Veneziano - Museo Correr
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Apocheima hispidaria f. obscura – mounted specimen Male ventral

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Autoportrait au haut de forme et à la pipe by Marcel Briguiboul Musée Goya‎ Castres France

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Iphigenia brasiliensis (Giant False Donax), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-02 06:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Rachky

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-02 08:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Diplomat A Coupé - right front view
Used in:
de:Opel Kapitän/Admiral/Diplomat A, sv:KAD (bilar)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico)

(Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))

Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México

(Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
Reason:
The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
✓ Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)

 Comment The light on the cable is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)[edit]

   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

African chaffinch taxonomy change[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-03-31 18:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla coelebs africana (African Chaffinch) male
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 04:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-04-11 10:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla spodiogenys (African Chaffinch) male

 Question @Charlesjsharp: Both images are looking equal. Is "Pending Most Valued Review Candidates" really the right place? --Milseburg (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London
Used in:
en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

 Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2020-12-16 02:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Mavathuru lake at Kotagiri, Karnataka
Used in:
Kotagiri
@Ikan Kekek: It was was written in Instagram post description that Available on Wikimedia commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. The watermarked version was reviewed by User:MB-one for the same license on 8 May 2020, link for original version is available at Other versions.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-04-19 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Mavathoor Kere (lake) near Kanakapura, Karnataka
Used in:
wikidata:Q124841427
Reason:
In 2020, this image was wrongly labelled as being in Kotagiri (Tamil Nadu), it did not have a geotag, and it was promoted to VI based on this incorrect information. The lake is actually in the neighbouring state of Karnataka. The file name and description have been corrected, and geotag added. I am nominating it for the correct scope, to replace the wrong VI scope. --Tagooty (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) -- Tagooty (talk)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"